Featured

Blog

Listen to Bill Nye answer my question during his keynote at the SXSWEco 2016 conference:

Advertisements

Pond Scum Explains Evolution Of First Animals

[This article was accepted for publication and scheduled for online publication in NASA-sponsored Astrobiology Magazine, https://www.astrobio.net/news-exclusive/]

Earliest animals evolved on seafloor microbial mats
By Emily Moskal

 

When Charles Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species and for decades thereafter, scientists ascribed the beginning of animal life to the Cambrian, eventually pinned to about 540 million years ago when trilobites and other multicellular organisms emerged in a relatively short timeframe. It was not until the 1940s that geologist Reginald Sprigg discovered Precambrian Ediacaran fossils in Australia.

In recent years, however, astonishing complexity has been discovered in the period right before the advent of the “Cambrian explosion,” revising the scientific view of the origins of the most complex, multicellular life on Earth.

“By the time we get to the Cambrian—which has much more familiar organisms—a lot of the evolution has already happened on Earth,” said Mary Droser, a paleobiologist at the University of California, Riverside.

Droser is the lead author of a recently published paper in the Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences describing the conditions that led to the rise of the earliest animals in the late Ediacaran period of the Precambrian, and the stages of evolution that led to their domination. Classification has proven difficult for soft-bodied Ediacara biota, as their remains are encased in some of the oldest rocks on the planet. But uniting attributes like multicellularity, bilateral body shapes, and movement to find food have surfaced in recent years. Droser said it was time to compile and synthesize the published research on the topic.

Although scientists have widely credited the Ediacaran for harboring early animal life, researchers mainly focused on fossil impressions of individual specimens. Droser and her colleagues, James Gehling and Lidya Tarhan, took a different approach by examining microbial textures, evidence of mobility, and species associations among fossil beds to gather clues about their ecology and evolution.

By studying how and why early animals settled or moved, scientists can get a glimpse into the lives of these long-gone animals and they adaptions they used to survive, including what kinds of surfaces they colonized and how they traveled and ate.

“One of the things that we look at is evidence of mobility, as opposed to the organism itself,” Droser said.

A trove of mobile information can be found about the Ediacaran in trace fossils—“footprints” left behind by the animals when they moved and interacted with the surrounding environment—rather than their actual body parts.

“We’re not just looking at the beautiful fossils but everything that’s there,” Droser said. “It’s looking at the weird and unusual things that actually provide a lot of the insight.”

Root-like anchors that attached sea fan-like organisms to the substrate, scraping marks left by mollusk-like algae eaters, and mining burrows left by worm-like animals — all are traces of what these extinct creatures left behind.

Before the ubiquity of predators, sediment mixers, and decomposers, what accumulated on the seafloor was not only organic material that fell to the seafloor but also mucus-like layers of microbes coating the sandy bottom called microbial mats. “Think pond scum,” Droser said.

The range and diversity microbial mats that served as the foothold for Ediacara biota would prove even more pivotal to the ecology of these ancient habitats. The mats offered an alternative path from the free-floating lifestyle of microscopic algae and bacteria as something for the new and enterprising species to attach to or feed from on a shifting seafloor. The stability and environmental complexity provided by the sticky mats made the extensive seafloor habitable.

The appearance, diversification, and evolution of Ediacara biota are inextricably linked to these mats. Researchers have found that with the rise of complex animals comes advancements in the microbial mats themselves, revealing the ecological interplay between the species, Droser said.

The advent of mobile taxa played the critical role of colonizing other mats after big disturbances, such as large storms, thereby preventing total community wipe outs. Mobile and immobile animals exploited the textural qualities of the mats representing different microbe brews — from microbial bunching of sediment to bumpy structures that resemble “elephant skin” or “bubble trains.”

Microbial textures are a proxy to understanding how sediment, microorganisms and macroorganisms interacted to produce consorts of animals, or assemblages, found in regular association across fossil beds. The Ediacaran stratigraphic record shows three distinct groups of animals that emerged successively—the Avalon, White Sea, and Nama assemblages—each with their own strategies to exploit their changing environment, spreading and then waning before many met evolutionary dead ends.

The Ediacaran, replete with explosive diversity, saw the first emergence of successful bilaterial animals that would later give rise to Earth’s first vertebrates, mobility, early mollusks, skeletons, plant-like reproduction, and population struggles like competition over resources and space, which are all vital components of modern animal ecosystems today.

“We would argue that the beginning of animal life as we know it begins in the Precambrian,” Droser said. “By the time that you get to the Cambrian, all of the major groups are established.”

Droser said studying the ecology and evolution before the Cambrian explosion offers key insights to how the early stages of the evolution of complex life may play out on other planets.

“It’s much cheaper and easier to go back in time our own planet and ask,” Droser said, “’How did the atmosphere and ocean chemistry interact with the nature of prokaryote, eukaryote, and multicellular evolution to produce a planet with this complex green scum around it?’”

The review was funded, in part, by the Exobiology & Evolutionary Biology element of the NASA Astrobiology Program. Mary Droser is a member of the NASA Astrobiology
Institute at the University of California, Riverside.